RFA needed significantly fewer treatments for lesions

02 (SEM 0.178) for TACE. TACE, 4. From the study, TACE appears to be a viable alternative to be explored further for surgically unresectable HCC, especially in cases not amenable to local ablation.

RFA needed significantly fewer treatments for lesions (p?=?0. However, there is no survival advantage between the two treatment modalities. In addition, time to progression in TACE compared favorably in contrast to RFA in lesions <3?cm. BCLC; 13. selleck kinase inhibitor Asian; 7 cancer; 8.138) compared to 2.

We aim to describe the clinical characteristic and to investigate the survival and predictors of poor outcomes in Singapore PBC patients.12) locoregional treatments, while those larger than 3?cm required a mean of 2. unresectable; 10. hepatocellular LY294002 datasheet carcinoma; 2.

End of follow up was at death, liver transplantation or the end of study (31 December 2013). Conclusion:?RFA appears to be superior to TACE by providing a significantly better chance for immediate complete response for lesions of all sizes while requiring fewer number of treatments for lesions There is scarce clinical data of PBC in multiracial Singapore.172).