What People Are Getting Wrong This Week: Oz Pearlman’s Magical Powers
We may earn a commission from links on this page.
Every few decades, the pop culture machine spits out a person who purports to have supernatural powers. In the 1980s, it was spoon-bending swami Uri Geller. In the 1990s and 2000s, it was “mediums” like John Edward, who supposedly talked to people’s dead relatives. In 2025, we have Oz Pearlman. To be fair, unlike the rest of these examples, Pearlman doesn't claim supernatural powers himself, but a lot of people seem to be taking his stage patter explanation for his mentalist tricks as the unvarnished truth. They're wrong.
Oz (pronounced “Oh’s”) has a hell of a schtick. The 43-year-old dude seems like an unassuming nerd, until he starts reading people's minds. In the years since he took third place on America’s Got Talent, Pearlman has done things like
It's only reasonable to assume that Oz Pearlman can’t actually read people’s minds, and “Magician Not Actually Doing Magic” isn’t much of a headline anyway. But the real story isn’t Pearlman, it’s the reaction he’s getting: As more media sources feature him and more people become fans, it’s becoming clear that a lot people who should know better are falling for his act.
How much can you tell from body language?
In
While psychologists can sometimes interpret general emotions from micro-expressions and body language, there’s no evidence that these could help divine specific thoughts, including the word you're thinking of, your PINs, or your childhood crushes. At best, body language gives you a vague sense of mood, but it fails at even broad tests like revealing whether you’re being lied to.
In other words, all his "reverse engineering the mind talk" is just patter from a magician, but it’s often reported as fact or left unexamined by media, as you can see in this recent
Oz Pearlman's carnival tricks
As with any kind of debunking, no one can prove a negative, so I can’t say for sure that Pearlman isn’t reading people’s postures, but if Pearlman could read people’s thoughts by how they hold their hands or whatever, why would he only prove it by doing variations on carnival mentalism gags that have been around for centuries? His gestures, nods, and pauses aren’t signs of mind-reading—they’re stage work. Pearlman's tricks will work whether the subject is expressive or stiff, because the outcome is already controlled through pre-show work, audience manipulation, and clever gimmicks.
Pearlman often puts a high tech spin on old tricks, and he's really good at what he does. For instance, check out this
Here's how it's done: First, Pearlman engages in the time-honored mentalist tradition of "sneaking a look." Here he is quickly memorizing the serial number on the random bill:
Then he asks for a phone to use as a calculator. If you turn your iPhone calculator to the side, as Pearlman does here,
it turns on scientific mode, and that lets you store a number. (Try it with your own phone if you wanna) Pearlman then quickly enters the serial number he's just seen, hits "store" and hands the phone back, so that it can be pulled up later. That's the whole trick. All the patter and dates and math whatnot are window dressing.
The rest of his tricks have similar explanations: forced picks, sneaky looks, and magician's gimmicks explain almost all of his mentalism—except his most mind-blowing tricks, like guessing Joe Rogan's PIN number. But those have an even easier explanation.
How Pearlman (probably) guessed Joe Rogan’s ATM PIN
Tricks aimed at individuals, like the PIN number or the name of a childhood crush, are done by learning this information before the show begins. Pearlman is likely employing a mentalism technique that's been around since at least the 1800s: using an advance team to gather "secret" information about prominent audience members long before the curtain goes up.
I’m not saying Pearlman hired someone to follow Rogan around or used
With these kinds of tricks, you're often only seeing the second part of the illusion. The first, pre-show part might involve asking the mark visit an innocent-seeming website (actually the magician's own site) to search for the name of a childhood crush. The magician can then read the "most recent searches" from his phone and pull the answer out "thin air."
It doesn't always go smoothly; like in the below clip from "Bussin with the Boys." Skip ahead to 3:42, and you'll see the mark reveals he's done an earlier web search for the person he's thinking of, and that he spelled the person's name wrong. Pearlman makes exactly the same spelling error, ruining the result:
Maybe the most amazing part is how smoothly Oz transitions away from the blown trick and still leaves the audience amazed; dude is really good at this shit.
The Uri Geller effect
In the 1970s and '80s, spoon-bending psychic Uri Geller occupied a similar place in popular culture as Pearlman does now. Geller was a frequent guest on daytime and late night talks shows, and his appearances were guaranteed to raise ratings. Hosts rarely challenged his claims of supernatural power, even though any magician could tell you how he did his signature spoon-bending tricks. Like Geller, Pearlman isn’t lying about bending spoons, he’s lying about how the spoons are getting bent.
In 2025 Pearlman couldn’t credibly claim otherworldly forces were helping him bend spoons like Uri Geller could in the 1970s, but he can get people to believe that micro-expressions and knowledge of human psychology will help you divine someone’s ATM PIN code. And unlike the 1970s, there seems to be no
I’m not knocking Oz Pearlman’s hustle—he’s a very skilled performer—but anyone should know that you can’t trust a magician. They entertain by making the impossible look real, but when supposedly serious journalistic outlets like 60 Minutes don’t even bother with a token pushback about a magician’s specious claims, there’s a problem.
